ABSTRACT

Crush pillars are used as part of the stope support in intermediate depth tabular mining stopes. Crush pillar design should ensure that the pillars crush when formed at the mining face. This behaviour of the pillars is typically achieved when the pillars have a width to height ratio of approximately 2:1. Once crushed, the residual stress state of the pillars provides a local support function.

Crush pillars are extensively used in the platinum mines of South Africa. In most cases, effective pillar crushing is not achieved, resulting in pillar seismicity. The objective of the research was to determine the parameters which influence crush pillar behaviour. A limit equilibrium model was identified as being able to simulate the behaviour of the pillars (Figure 2). The model, implemented in a displacement discontinuity boundary element code (TEXAN), provided insights into the stress evolution of a pillar, depending on its position relative to the mining face, the effect of over-sized pillars, and the impact of geological structures, layout and rock mass parameters, as well as mining depth. Figure 3 is an example of the effect of pillar width on crush pillar behaviour for an idealised crush pillar layout simulated at 600 metres below surface.

crushpillar1

Figure 1: Photograph of a crush pillar from a trial site on Lonmin Platinum. Note the wedge-like structure visible where the fractures intersect. The fractures are concentrated predominantly towards the east, which was mined first.

crushpillar2

Figure 2: Force equilibrium of an elementary material slice between two bounding surfaces (after Malan and Napier, 2006).

If the pillar width is w and if the pillar has completely failed, assuming that the stress profile is symmetric about the centre of the pillar, the average pillar stress (APS) in the pillar is given by equation 1. H represents the mining height, µ=Tanφ the frictional coefficient, Cb the unconfined strength of the crushed material and m a strengthening parameter.

crushpillar3

crushpillar4

 

Figure 3: Example of the effect of pillar width on crush pillar performance (600 m below surface). The pillar of interest was formed in mining step 5.

An underground mining trial was conducted at Lonmin Platinum to measure and visually observe the behaviour of crush pillars. This was the most comprehensive monitoring of these pillars ever conducted in the platinum industry. The visually observed behaviour of the pillars agreed well with the findings of the measurements and the pillar fracturing profiles obtained at various stages of the pillar forming cycle. A sequence and mode of pillar failure could be identified. The results indicated that a pillar reaches a residual stress state when separated from the mining face (Figure 4). The pillar experiences secondary, subsequent reductions in stress when new pillars are formed. This unloading phase has in the past typically only been referred to as continued strain softening behaviour. However, it was found that at some point, the pillars experienced no further reduction in stress whilst the pillars continued to deform. This observation was verified by convergence measurements. After all mining stopped, continued convergence was recorded (Figure 5).

crushpillar5

Figure 4: The stress change measured above an instrumented pillar (P2) versus time. The strain cell was installed prior to the pillar being formed.

A numerical model was used to back analyse the behaviour of the underground trial site which consisted of a mined area of approximately 22 000 m2 and 55 crush pillars. To date, no numerical modelling of a mine-wide tabular layout, which explicitly included a large number of crush pillars, had been reported in South Africa. This work is therefore considered a major, novel contribution to this field of research. After model calibration, both the observed and measured behaviour of the crush pillars in the trial site could be replicated. This was especially useful in evaluating the stress conditions measured above the pillars, as well as the total amount of convergence experienced adjacent to the pillars and at the panel mid-spans (Figure 5). The findings validated the use of the limit equilibrium model implemented in a displacement discontinuity boundary element code to simulate the behaviour of crush pillars on a large scale.

crushpillar6

Figure 5: Example of the measured versus modelled convergence at an instrumentation site adjacent to a pillar. The pillar is formed in mining step 2 and holed in mining step 3.

Dr. Michael Du Plessis